Legal Opinion
Sazima v. Chalko
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1999No. 1998-1510PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 151.] SAZIMA, APPELLANT, v. CHALKO, APPELLEE. [Cite as Sazima v. Chalko,
1999-Ohio-92.] Civil procedure—Trial court abuses its discretion in dismissing an action with prejudice for party’s unexplained failure to timely comply with an order for a more definite statement, when. (No. 98-1510—Submitted May 4, 1999—Decided July 28, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, Nos. 72769 and 73138. __________________ {¶ 1} On April 3, 1995, appellant, Susan Sazima, filed a complaint for legal malpractice…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Quonset Hut, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Perotti v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ocran v. RichlakOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- St. Anthony the Great Romanian Orthodox Monastery, Inc. v. SomleaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Combs v. REO Allegiance, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- First National Bank of S.W. v. Doellman, Unpublished Decision (4-4-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Irani v. AMF Bowling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.