Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Veazey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 24, 1993No. 1920586Published

1Dissent

The majority concludes that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in applying the workers' compensation standard in the present case. After reviewing the record, I believe that the Court of Civil Appeals correctly held that Roberts had suffered a total disability. This Court should follow its ruling inEx parte Eastwood Foods, Inc., 575 So.2d 91 (Ala. 1991), where it affirmed the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals in a case like this one. However, the facts of Roberts's situation are much more disturbing than the facts in Eastwood. Roberts's leg amputation will restrict him from walking for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Wright v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API