Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Nirenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover certain stock or its value, order granting defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to serve an amended complaint, on the ground that causes of action are improperly united, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendant to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The two causes of action stated in the complaint involve the same subject-matter, arise out of the same transaction, and seek the same result, to wit, the return of the stock or its value.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Virdone v. Globe Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warren v. PutmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API