Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jones v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1991No. 48A02-8912-CR-638Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHoffman, Presiding Judge

I dissent to Issue One and concur in the remaining issues.

Jones was prosecuted under the wrong habitual offender statute.

Since the prior felonies were committed prior to September 1, 1985, IND.CODE § 35-50-2-7.1 (1988 Ed.) does not apply in this case. Moncrief v. State (1988), Ind.App., 525 N.E.2d 1286.

This case should be remanded for new sentencing.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moncrief v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988