Legal Opinion

Sellman v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 24, 2016No. 84/15Published

1Opinion of the Court

Donzel Sellman v. State of Maryland, No. 84, September Term, 2015. Opinion by Greene, J. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—FOURTH AMENDMENT—REASONABLE SUSPICION On the basis of reasonable suspicion that an individual is armed and dangerous, an officer may conduct a Terry frisk. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868,

20 L. Ed. 2d 889

(1968). When reviewing whether reasonable suspicion exists, the test is the totality of the circumstances, viewed through the eyes of a reasonably prudent police officer. The test is objective. Reasonable suspicion requires an officer to have specific and articulable facts…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API