Legal Opinion

People v. Kang

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 20, 1995No. 4—94—0223PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lund

Following a jury trial in the circuit court of McLean County, defendant Chung Uk Kang was convicted of perjury (720 ILCS 5/32 — 2 (West 1992)) and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment, to be served consecutively to a sentence he was serving when the alleged perjury was committed. He now appeals, claiming (1) the testimony used to convict him was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights, (2) the evidence was insufficient to convict him, (3) the jury was erroneously instructed that he could be convicted absent proof of specific intent, and (4) his prison sentence is excessive and the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WilkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. People v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API