Legal Opinion

Eilts v. Hines

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1969No. 669A98Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Sullivan, J.

I must respectfully dissent from the per curiam opinion dismissing this appeal. While I do not wish to unduly burden the official reports by unnecessary verbiage a brief recital of the essential facts are deemed necessary to the proper determination of the cause.

*201On March 18, 1962, defendant-appellee Homer Kester executed and delivered a. Warranty Deed to plaintiffs-appellants Eilts, husband and wife. Thereafter, Mr. and Mrs. Eilts sued Kester and several other defendants to evict them from a part of the real estate described in that deed. Of the five defendants…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Drudge v. DavissonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Toops v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Newkirk v. WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Leikauf v. GrosjeanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API