Legal Opinion

Istrouma Mercantile Co. v. Northern Assur, Co., Limited

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 2, 1935No. 33455PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

Plaintiff' instituted two suits on fire insurance policies to recover the face value thereof; that is, $2,500 in the Northern Assurance Company of London, and $2,500 in the North River Insurance Company of New York, together with the statutory penalty of 12 per cent, and 20 per cent, attorney’s fees, with interest from judicial demand.

The defendants denied liability. The defenses in both suits are the same, except in the case of the first-named defendant, Northern Assurance Company of London, wherein the defendant set up an additional special defense peculiar to itself, that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. East Texas Fire Insurance v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Corporation of Roman Catholic Church v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. L'Engle v. Scottish Union & National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  5. Senor v. Western Millers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Mfg. Corp. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Campo v. LaNasaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Wallace v. World Fire & Marine Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
  4. In Re GeninLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Garner v. VaughnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API