Givorns v. City of Valley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurrence
I concur in the holding that these appellants, under the facts of this case, have not shown that they had a right to vote in this particular annexation election, because they reside outside the annexed territory. By voting to affirm the judgment here, however, I should not be understood as agreeing that a person residing outside an annexed area might not have standing to challenge governmental action that would affect the property rights of individuals or corporations who own property in the annexed territory. The holding in Gomillion v.Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339, 81 S.Ct. 125, 5 L.Ed.2d 110…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- City of Birmingham v. Community Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- MARSHALL COUNTY CITIZENS v. City of GuntersvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992