Legal Opinion · Dissent

Yorko v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1985No. 470-84Published

1DissentTeague, Judge

After a bench trial, Kenneth Alan Yorko, appellant, was convicted of “possesspng] with intent to sell an obscene device, namely, a dildo, knowing the content and character of the device.” Punishment was assessed at three days’ confinement in the Harris County jail and a $750 fine.

This offense is circumscribed by the provisions of V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sections 43.21(a)(7) and 43.23(c)(1). The latter provides in part that a person commits an offense if, knowing its content and character, he possesses any obscene device with intent to promote it. The word “promote” is statutorily defined to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API