O'Barr v. Duncan
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
1. The ground of the motion for new trial which contends that a portion of the court’s charge therein referred to was not adjusted to the plaintiffs’ contention as made by the pleadings and evidence, when considered in connection with the entire charge, is without merit.
2. A charge which in effect instructs the jury that an easement appurtenant created by deed passes with the dominant estate, although the conveyance thereof may not have expressly mentioned the easement, was pertinent to the issue, and stated a correct principle of law. Stovall v. Coggins Granite…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Stovall v. Coggins Granite Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Mayor of Savannah v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Daniel v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Barton v. GammellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Montana v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Church of the Nativity, Inc. v. WhitenerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.