Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Transit Development Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action for an injunction. Demurrer to answer,

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

The plaintiff as the owner and occupant of certain real property in Brooklyn comes into court seeking injunctive relief in equity against the defendant on the ground that the defendant so conducts its business as to create a continuing nuisance which has injured and will injure the plaintiff in the legitimate use of her property. In addition to the prayer for injunctive relief, she asks money damages for past injury, but this part of her claim for relief can be considered by the court simply as incidental to the main purpose of injunctive relief. As to the past injuries she has an adequate…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haber v. Paramount Ice Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Flynn v. New York, Westchester & Boston Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Raymond v. Transit Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Olpp v. Hocking Valley Railway Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1920
  5. People v. KukkanenAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API