United States v. Johnny Edward Stober
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentWilliam E. Doyle, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent.
I contend, contrary to the majority, that the meaning of the term “convicted” is to be determined in accordance with federal law. After all, this is a federal crime and if we are to be subject to the interpretation which the courts of every state in the land give, it is going to be an unholy mess.
The defendant was prosecuted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(h) and 924(a). Section 922(h) declares that “It shall be unlawful for any person — (1) who is under indictment for, or who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- James Wade Braswell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Major Henry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Larry Dean TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Jack BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Mark Steven PlaceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.