Legal Opinion

People v. Lintz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1930No. Docket No. 137, Calendar No. 34,433PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Defendants were convicted of obtaining money from Arthur L. Loveland under false pretenses. They negotiated a trade of Loveland’s house for a farm owned by Walter Franklin. The testimony of the people was that defendants represented to Loveland that the farm was incumbered by a mortgage of $565, which he would have to pay to make the trade; they said Whitesell would pay it and Loveland could reimburse him; Loveland gave them the money to repay Whitesell; there was no mortgage on the premises, and defendants appropriated the money to their own use. The details may be found in People v. Lintz,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. OrrMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. LintzMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. CismadijaMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. StatkiewiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. People v. LennoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. AsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. GuiseMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API