Legal Opinion

Washington v. Spriggs

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 22, 1925No. 6 Div. 154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The action is for forcible entry and detainer. The property sued for* is described as “that certain three-room house upon west half of northeast quarter of section eleven, township twenty-two, range eight, built by Mr. L. E. Patton,” etc.

The plaintiff, after testifying the house was built by L. E. Patton, and that plaintiff resided upon the tract of lands, offered a contract in writing between him and Patton giving the latter the right to build the house, describing the same tract of lands, and providing that, whenever Patton ceases mine operations and discontinues the permanent use of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farley v. Bay Shell Road Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Crocker v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Dent v. StovallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Powell v. SturdevantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Wade v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warren v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Williams v. PratherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Donald v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Kartus Department Stores v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Boutwell v. County B. of Education of Escambia CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API