Legal Opinion

Hallmark Insurance v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 31, 1989No. 87-2512PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano

Plaintiffs seek to recover property damages they sustained when the driver of a stolen Chicago Transit Authority bus lost control of the vehicle and struck their building. They appeal from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant.

Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint contains two counts of negligence against the CTA, the first based on a violation of the City of Chicago’s municipal code and the second on common law negligence. Plaintiffs allege that on January 12, 1982, an unnamed individual took unauthorized control of a CTA bus which was located in a bus bam owned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Janes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Motz v. Central National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Kaelin v. NuelleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Enders v. Apcoa, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Saladino v. Team Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Nelson v. Quarles and Brady, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. Phillips v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. O'Donnell v. Bailey & Associates Counseling & Psychotherapy LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  5. Johnson v. BishopAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API