Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1979No. KCD 30270PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Gerald D. Peterson appeals from his conviction of burglary second degree and stealing. Reversed.

The case against defendant was based on circumstantial evidence consisting of stolen articles and burglary tools. In this appeal defendant contends that the incriminating evidence was obtained by unlawful search and seizure in violation of rights protected by the Fourth Amendment and that the trial court erred in failing to suppress such evidence in response to defendant’s motion.

A summary of the evidence presented at the suppression motion hearing is necessary to define the legal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Virgil F. Ryder v. Terry Morris, Superintendent, Moberly Training Center for MenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. State v. MangoldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. People v. VelleffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. State v. KusterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. State v. HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API