McMahan v. McMahan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Kupferman, J. (concurring in partial dissent). I
am in substantial concurrence with the dissent by my colleague, Kassal, J. However, I believe another view should be presented. 1i Inasmuch as both parties seek a divorce for cruel and inhuman treatment, it would appear that, at the very least, a dual divorce should be granted. (See 1 Foster-Freed, Law and the Family, 1983 Cum Supp, § 6:27A [Dual Divorce]; John W. S. v Jeanne F. S., 48 AD2d 30; Belandres v Belandres, 58 AD2d 63; Lischynsky v Lischynsky, 95 AD2d 111; Patrizio v Patrizio, 96 AD2d 1149.) ¶ Accordingly, the question of fault comes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lischynsky v. LischynskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Belandres v. BelandresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- John W. S. v. Jeanne F. S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Patrizio v. PatrizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983