Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McMahan v. McMahan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1984Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kupferman, J. (concurring in partial dissent). I

am in substantial concurrence with the dissent by my colleague, Kassal, J. However, I believe another view should be presented. 1i Inasmuch as both parties seek a divorce for cruel and inhuman treatment, it would appear that, at the very least, a dual divorce should be granted. (See 1 Foster-Freed, Law and the Family, 1983 Cum Supp, § 6:27A [Dual Divorce]; John W. S. v Jeanne F. S., 48 AD2d 30; Belandres v Belandres, 58 AD2d 63; Lischynsky v Lischynsky, 95 AD2d 111; Patrizio v Patrizio, 96 AD2d 1149.) ¶ Accordingly, the question of fault comes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lischynsky v. LischynskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Belandres v. BelandresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. John W. S. v. Jeanne F. S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Patrizio v. PatrizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API