Legal Opinion

Trump v. Hawaii

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 24, 2017No. 16–1540PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari in this case to resolve a challenge to the temporary suspension of entry of aliens and refugees under Section 2(c) and Section 6 of Executive Order No. 13,780. Because those provisions of the Order have "expired by [their] own terms." the appeal no longer presents a "live case or controversy." Burke v. Barnes, 479 U.S. 361, 363, 107 S.Ct. 734, 93 L.Ed.2d 732 (1987). Following our established practice in such cases, the judgment is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to dismiss as moot…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Burke v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. Hamed Almaqrami v. Michael PompeoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Mark Spell v. John EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. State of Hawaii v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Charles Clark, III v. Governor of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API