Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States Rubber Co. v. Ball

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1963No. 807Published

1ConcurrenceTate, Judge

The writer signed the majority opinion with some reservations. He retains them in signing this denial of the defendant-appellant’s application for rehearing.

I am very frank to say that, on the face of the cold record, I believe the defendant, Miss Ball, by the great preponderance of the evidence has proved her defense that the plaintiff’s credit manager agreed, prior to her purchase, that she could buy the going tire business of Coco & Fuglaar, Inc., without being liable for the debt due by this firm to the plaintiff. If so, of course, the plaintiff is estopped from subsequently seeking to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chelsea Sales Corp. v. A. Jacobs Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API