Legal Opinion

County of Cook v. Village of Rosemont

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 4, 1999No. 1-98-2847PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

This is a constitutional shootout. The weapons are ordinances purportedly authorized by the home rule provisions of the Illinois Constitution of 1970.

Cook County’s ordinance creates an amusement tax that is to be collected and remitted by owners and operators of amusement places. The Village of Rosemont, which owns and operates amusement places, enacted an ordinance that provides the Village’s patrons won’t pay the tax and Village employees won’t collect it.

When the smoke clears, only the County is standing. But it’s not over yet.

FACTS

In November 1996, pursuant to its home rule powers, Cook…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kalodimos v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Murneigh v. GainerIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. State Board of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Kerasotes Rialto Theater Corp. v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blanchard v. BerriosIllinois Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API