Legal Opinion

Rutter v. BX of Tri-Cities, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 26, 1991No. 10368-4-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

David Rutter appeals a summary judgment in favor of Business Exchange, Inc., contending Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act should govern termination of a franchise agreement between Business Exchange, Inc., and BX of Tri-Cities, Inc., despite a choice of law clause in the agreement.

Business Exchange, Inc. (BEI), a California corporation, operates a nationwide barter club for businesses through a number of local franchises called Business Exchanges (BX). Under this franchise arrangement, BEI grants exclusive licenses to qualified franchisees to conduct the business exchange…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. O'BRIEN v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Coast to Coast Stores, Inc. v. GruschusWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Gaunce v. SchoderWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Yei Sun v. Advanced China HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Department of Labor & Industries v. Lyons Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Stewart v. Estate of SteinerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Ito International Corp. v. Prescott, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. Stewart v. Estate of SteinerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API