Legal Opinion

Asmussen v. United States

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided November 2, 1984No. Civ. No. 82-3015Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DONALD J. PORTER, District Judge.

W.J. and Alice Asmussen, plaintiff taxpayers, seek to recover $43,368.65 plus interest paid as federal income tax for calendar year 1976. The central issue in this action is whether a gain recognized by the taxpayers on the sale of rye in 1976 is long-term capital gain or ordinary income. The rye was originally produced by taxpayers on their South Dakota grain farm, then pledged to the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) as security for a loan, and later redeemed. Although Section 1221 of the IRC would generally preclude capital gains…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fritz Thompson and Dora M. Thompson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. Investers Diversified Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Thompson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  4. United States v. C. R. BondurantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  5. Carl Marks & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API