Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. North Hudson County Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In error to the Hudson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

Under “An act to enable street car or horse-railroad companies to provide better accommodation to the-*539public by using what is now known as the cable system for motive power on elevated railroads,” approved March 26th, 1886 (Pamph L., p. 126), the North Hudson County Railroad Company obtained the appointment of commissioners to examine and appraise the easement and right of passage over-Oakland avenue, Jersey City, in front of two city lots, with apartment houses erected thereon, situate on the westerly side-of said avenue, and belonging to the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hempstead v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Borough of Harvey Cedars v. KaranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Crosby v. WellsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  4. Halsey v. Rapid Transit Street Railway Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
  5. Mantorville Railway & Transfer Co. v. Teunis SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API