Legal Opinion

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 29, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickerson, J.

Sinclair Refining Company, here called Sinclair, brought this suit against Mrs. Lula May Martin and husband, D. D. Martin, to enforce specific performance of an option to purchase a service station and lot on Gallatin Road, Davidson County, Tennessee, fully described in the bill.

By answer, defendants set up the defenses that: (1) the lease, which contained the option to purchase, was *68signed by Mrs. Lula May Martin, in -whom title to tbe land was vested, without knowing that the option to purchase clause was in the lease contract; (2) her signature was procured to this contract in a fraudulent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Beasley v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Parsons Et Ux. v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Johnson v. BrowderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Lockhart v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  2. Dunnivant v. NafeTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Carolyn Payne v. Maxine BradleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API