McCue v. Knoxville Borough
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County
No. 99 October Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 526 January Term 1890, C. P. No. 2. To the first Monday of January, 1890, Dominick McCue brought trespass against the borough of Knoxville. Issue.
Read the full summary
No. 99 October Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 526 January Term 1890, C. P. No. 2. To the first Monday of January, 1890, Dominick McCue brought trespass against the borough of Knoxville. Issue. At the trial, on January 15, 1891, testimony was introduced on the part of the plaintiff to the effect that, in 1889, the plaintiff, fifty-one years of age, was employed as a watchman at the Pittsburgh Shoe Factory and other business places in Knoxville borough; that, on Zara street passing the shoe factory, there was a board-walk, and in it in front of the factory were two holes, near each…
1Per curiam
This case could not have been withdrawn from the jury, as requested by the defendant’s eighth point. The only other question is as to the admissibility of the evidence based upon the Carlisle tables. This question has just been disposed of in Steinbrunner v. Railway Co., decided herewith, ante, 504.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- McCaffrey v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Glover v. BergerWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
- Campbell v. City of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896