Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Standard Accident Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1913No. Docket No. 89PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Branch; Knowlen, J. Assumpsit by James R. Patterson against the Stand» ard Accident Insurance Company. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

This action was brought on a certain so-called accident policy of insurance, issued to plaintiff by defendant, for his protection from specified losses which might result to him in connection with the use of two designated automobiles within a stated period of time.

Within the period covered by the policy, a young man named Reagan was killed in a collision with one of the automobiles mentioned, while plaintiff was driving it. An inquest held over the remains of the young man resulted in a finding of the coroner’s jury that he came to his death through plaintiff’s negligence in operating his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Bronson Plating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ex Parte RieckCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. United States v. P. F. Collier & Son Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  4. United States v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  5. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. PiccardMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API