Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Smith-Walker
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 2024No. 23CA012006Published
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Ortiz v. Smith-Walker,
2024-Ohio-2298.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) EDGAR ORTIZ, et al. C.A. No. 23CA012006 Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE LEANNA SMITH-WALKER, et al. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF LORAIN, OHIO Appellees CASE No. 2022 PC 00049 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: June 17, 2024 FLAGG LANZINGER, Judge. {¶1} Edgar Ortiz and Keila Mercado (“Claimants”) appeal from the judgment of the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division. For the following reasons, this Court affirms. I. {¶2}…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Whaley v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Stammco, L.L.C. v. United Tel. Co. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Cashland Fin. Servs., Inc. v. HoytOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Breazeale v. Infrastructure & Dev. Eng., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.