Legal Opinion

Galvan v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), dated March 8, 2005, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To prevail on a cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1), a plaintiff must prove both that the statute was violated and that the violation was a proximate cause of his injuries (see Bland v Manocherian, 66 NY2d 452 [1985]; Lightfoot v State of New…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Narducci v. Manhasset Bay AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Bland v. ManocherianNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Roberts v. General Electric CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peay v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Moncayo v. Curtis Partition Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Podobedov v. East Coast Construction Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Pazmino v. 41-50 78th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Wysk v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API