Legal Opinion

Hogan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1934No. 7272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

This proceeding was instituted by the appellant and was designed to abrogate a patent issued by the United States for lands covered by a M exiean land grant. The claim and the Mexican grant were confirmed more than 75 years ago by the “Board of Commissioners,” established by and acting in accordance with “An Act to ascertain and settle the private Land Claims in the State of California.” Act March 3, 1851, c. 41, 9 Stat. 631. The patent was issued more than 60 years ago. The following is a statement of the case, largely adapted from the appellant's brief:

On October 7,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Beard v. FederySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Botiller v. DominguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Barker v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Minnesota Co. v. National Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1866

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gustason v. California Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  2. Blue v. McKayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955
  3. Porter v. BuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API