Legal Opinion

Young v. West

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for damages to crops. Appeal from the County Court of McLean county; the Hon. R. A. Russell, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baume

This is a suit by appellee against appellant to recover damages to crops, resulting from the alleged improper and negligent tiling by appellant of land occupied by appellee as a tenant of Mrs. Schurtz. There was a verdict and judgment in the court below against appellant for $70.

Appellant is the owner of 90 acres of land lying adjacent to and on the east side of a public highway, and Mrs. Schurtz is the owner of 40 acres of land lying adjacent to and on the west side of said highway. The natural drainage of surface water on appellant’s land is westward across the highway on the land of Mrs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. NuetzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  2. St. Louis Merchants' Bridge Terminal Ry. Co. v. PepperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lindstrum v. Illinois Northern Utilities Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  2. Comerford v. MorrisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  3. Sheedy v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API