Legal Opinion

(PC) Harris v. Sexton

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 11, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00080Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARNEST S. HARRIS, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00080-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 13 v. ) RECOMMENDING TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY THE PROCEEDINGS ) 14 SEXON, et al., ) [ECF No. 50] 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On June 14, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to stay the proceedings. 20 I. 21 BACKGROUND 22 This action is proceeding against Defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API