STATE Ex SCHAEFER v. ZANGERLE Et

LEVINE, PJ.

The court found it profitable to quote the major part of the allegations of the plaintiffs petition because the language reciting the history of the erection of the LorainCarnegie Bridge, and which led to the present controversy is so clearly set forth, as to decisively present the issues which this court is called upon to determine.

It will be seen from a perusal of the plaintiff’s petition that the bond issue authorized by the vote of the people of Cleveland was:

" * * * for the purpose of paying the cost and expenses of erecting a bridge with the necessary approaches thereto, from…