Samuel H. Hood v. United States of America, Harry A. Jackson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McGOWAN, Circuit Judge.
On these appeals from a jury conviction of robbery, two alleged errors in the course of the trial itself are advanced as requiring reversal. 1 One has to do with the failure of the trial court to direct the Government that it could not use a conviction to impeach appellant Hood. The other derives from the failure to restrict the cross-examination of appellant’s alibi witness. We affirm because we do not believe reversal is necessitated by either, or both together.
I
At the close of the Government’s case, defense counsel approached the bench to report that appellant Hood…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Charles M. Luck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Fitzpatrick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Robert Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
3Cited by61 opinions
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- William J. Gass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. William A. Raper, United States of America v. Eli B. Childs, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Edwin Charles Fortes, Jr., United States of America v. Sandra Elaine JemisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.