Legal Opinion

Totton v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1936No. Civ. No. 5796PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The court delivered the following opinion from the bench:

This cause is before us upon the petition of Diane Totton seeking to restrain the superior court from further proceeding with the hearing of a second motion for nonsuit now pending in the case in said court where Diane Totton is plaintiff and Frank Totton, her husband, is also plaintiff, against Martin Belfrie and Chevrolet Motor Company, defendants. It appears that the Chevrolet Motor Company made a motion for a nonsuit which was denied. Later on the motor company asked permission to renew its motion for nonsuit. Permission…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. Fox v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bohn v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API