Legal Opinion

United States v. William Barnerd

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 11, 1989No. 88-2549PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

William Barnerd appeals from the sentence imposed upon him after pleading guilty to charges of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and to possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. The only issue raised on appeal deals with the constitutionality of the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. 1

Barnerd first argues that the guidelines violate the separation of powers doctrine, because the service of Article III judges on the Sentencing Commission threatens the independence and impartiality…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. Daniel FaticoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Helen Faye NunleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Eric Brittman, United States of America v. Eric BrittmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert E. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Maggie Louise Turpin, United States of America v. Darryl Lee WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Jackie L. Luster, United States of America v. Sue LusterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Charles Lester MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Karen Sue FrederickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API