Tomondong v. Ikezaki

This is a petition for a rehearing. It is based on three grounds. The first is that "the decision erroneously assumes that the contract of insurance between Ikezaki and the Ocean Accident Guarantee Corporation, Ltd., was a part of the record of the hearing had in said case before the industrial accident board, when the facts are that such contract of insurance was never a part of the record in such case in the hearing before the industrial accident board." In the same petition it is expressly admitted that "it is true that a copy of the contract of insurance was on file with the industrial…