Legal Opinion

Tatum v. Preston Carter Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1986No. C-3970PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GONZALEZ, Justice.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the court of appeals applied the correct legal standard when it ordered a remittitur of exemplary damages. John C. Tatum, Jr. sued Preston Carter Company for breach of an agency agreement and breach of fiduciary duty. After a jury trial, the trial court rendered judgment for Tatum for actual damages, exemplary damages, and attorney fees. In an unpublished opinion, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment as to some of the actual damages and reversed and rendered as to other damages. To preserve the exact…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. FarnsworthTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Southwestern Investment Company v. NeeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Bentley v. BuntonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wanda Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Barker v. EckmanTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Gunn Infiniti, Inc. v. O'BYRNETexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Tucker, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API