Legal Opinion

In re Durey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.

The proceeding was instituted on the petition of Cyrus Durey to perpetuate testimony of Truman J. Whitman under article 31 of the Civil Practice Act. The principal question presented is whether or not the petition states facts sufficient to justify the order.

This article, entitled “Perpetuation of testimony in real property actions,” provides: “ § 316. Application to take deposition and to perpetuate testimony. Where a person has been, or he and those under .whom he claims have been, for one year in possession of real property or of an -undivided interest therein, claiming it in fee, or for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rochester Railway Co. v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. House v. . CarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Joslyn v. . RockwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. People ex rel. McGuinness v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re CallahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  2. United States v. Certain Lands in City of JamestownDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API