Legal Opinion
In Re Arbitration Between S & R Co. & Latona Trucking, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 8, 1997No. 1:97-cv-00865PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
MeAVOY, Chief Judge.
Petitioners, S&R Company of Kingston (“S & R”) and Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”), brought this petition, pursuant to Section 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 4, seeking to compel arbitration of a dispute presently pending before this Court in an action entitled Latona Trucking, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. et al., (96-CV-306) (“Latona v. Hartford” or “pending action”). The Petitioners commenced the instant action following an Order by Magistrate Judge David R. Homer, in Latona v. Hartford, denying Petitioners’ request…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Compel Arbitration Between S & R Co. of Kingston v. Latona Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Clarendon National Insurance v. LanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- TP, Inc. v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re TP, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Upstate Shredding, LLC v. Carloss Well Supply Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Company of Kingston v. Latona Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.