United States Casualty Co. v. Malone

In the suggestion of error in this case it is said that we erred in our former opinion in four particulars, viz.:

*289“ (1) In holding that the proof is insufficient to show the injury complained of.

“(2) In holding that the injury was intentional, and not an accident.

“(3) In reversing the chancellor on the facts and. holding that there is no liability whatever.

“(4) In failing to give alternative relief under the general prayer of the bill.”

As to the first three grounds of error assigned, we are satisfied to rest upon the opinion formerly rendered.

As to the fourth ground of error, it might be…