Legal Opinion
CJC Holdings, Inc. v. Wright & Lato, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1993No. 92-8386Published
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 92-8386. CJC HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a ArtCarved, A Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WRIGHT & LATO, INC., Defendant-Appellee. April 29, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. POLITZ, Chief Judge: CJC Holdings, Inc. and its attorneys appeal the imposition of sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Concluding that the district court misapprehended the plausibility of the legal position urged in the offending…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Cjc Holdings, Inc., D/B/A Artcarved v. Wright & Lato, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Prentiss E. Smith, M.D., Phillip A. Wittmann, Movants-Appellants v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.