Legal Opinion
Brown v. Eppler
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 2, 2013No. 11-5093PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff David Brown brings this appeal from the dismissal of his action challenging his ban from using public transportation provided by the Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority (the “MTTA”). Brown asserted claims arising under the United States Constitution, federal civil rights laws, and Oklahoma state law. The district court granted summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) in favor of the MTTA as well as defendants J.D. Eppler, Ray Willard, Jane Doe, and Janet Doe (collectively “employee defendants”). In so doing, the court concluded Brown…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lister v. Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- In re NotaryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2016
- Martinez v. Guadalupe CountyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Miskovsky v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Chacon v. Albuquerque Police Dep'tDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.