Legal Opinion

Magney v. Lincoln Mutual Savings Bank

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 17, 1983No. 4929-9-IIIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoe, C.J.

The issue in this case is whether a state chartered mutual savings bank may enforce a "due-on-sale" provision in a deed of trust when the borrower later assigns his interest in the property and there is no increased risk to the lender.

In 1977, plaintiffs Richard and Lynn Magney purchased a 4-family dwelling. To finance the purchase price of $76,000, Magneys borrowed $55,000 from defendant Lincoln Mutual Savings Bank. They signed a promissory note at 9 V2 percent interest for 25 years, which note was secured by a deed of trust. The Magneys also executed a mortgage of $8,000, junior to the deed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Salois v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Klem v. Washington Mutual BankWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Neil Rush v. William I. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Smith v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. McCausland v. Bankers Life Insurance Co. of NebraskaWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Mellon v. Regional Trustee Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API