Hodess v. Bonefont
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.
After a trial, a judge of the Worcester County Housing Court concluded that the plaintiffs had not established “cause” (under the standards discussed in Spence v. Gormley, 387 Mass. 258 [1982]) to justify the defendant’s eviction from their Green Hill Towers development. We reverse the judgment.
On August 19, 1985, the defendant occupied an apartment under a written lease in the plaintiffs’ 185-unit development. *578The development is financed by the Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency. Living with her were her two sons, David, age sixteen and Raphael, age fifteen. Sometime about 1:30 p.m. on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trustees of the Stigmatine Fathers, Inc. v. Secretary of Administration & FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Mmoe v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Narcisa Lopez v. Henry Phipps Plaza South, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Spence v. GormleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Dominick v. DominickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hodess v. BonefontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988