Legal Opinion

Hodess v. Bonefont

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 3, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.

After a trial, a judge of the Worcester County Housing Court concluded that the plaintiffs had not established “cause” (under the standards discussed in Spence v. Gormley, 387 Mass. 258 [1982]) to justify the defendant’s eviction from their Green Hill Towers development. We reverse the judgment.

On August 19, 1985, the defendant occupied an apartment under a written lease in the plaintiffs’ 185-unit development. *578The development is financed by the Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency. Living with her were her two sons, David, age sixteen and Raphael, age fifteen. Sometime about 1:30 p.m. on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Stigmatine Fathers, Inc. v. Secretary of Administration & FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Mmoe v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Narcisa Lopez v. Henry Phipps Plaza South, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Spence v. GormleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Dominick v. DominickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hodess v. BonefontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API