Legal Opinion

Abramsen v. Bedminster

Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands

Decided August 13, 2002No. Civil No. 700/2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Judge

*5MEMORANDUM OPINION

(August 13, 2002)

Before the Court is Defendants Vince Bedminster (“Bedminster”) and Devcon International Corporation’s (“Devcon”) Joint Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants contend that the statute of limitations had expired on the plaintiff’s cause of action before she filed this lawsuit.1 Therefore, plaintiffs suit is barred and should be dismissed. Defendant asserts, however, that plaintiffs had waived the defense of the statute of limitations. For the reasons enumerated below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted, and this case will be dismissed.

FACT…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. United States v. MarolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joseph v. Church of God (Holiness) AcademySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2006
  2. Rivera v. SharpDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API