Legal Opinion

Mound City Paint & Color Co. v. Commercial National Bank of Ogden

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of tbe first district. Tbe opinion states tbe facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Zane, C. J.:

Tbe plaintiff (a corporation under tbe laws of tbe state of Missouri, and doing business at St. Louis in tbat state) instituted its action against tbe defendant (a corporation under tbe laws of tbe United States, engaged in the busi*354ness of banking at Ogden, Utali), on a bill of exchange for two hundred and fifty-four dollars and forty-three cents, drawn by plaintiff on Bishop & Schaeffer, a firm at Ogden, payable at sight to the defendant.

The complaint contained the allegation, among others, that defendant undertook to collect the draft described. The defendant interposed a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Exchange Nat. Bank of Pittsburgh v. Third Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matlock v. Citizens National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. First National Bank v. BakkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Grower's Marketing Service, Inc. v. Webster & Atlas National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. St. Louis Carbonating & Mfg. Co. v. Lookeba State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API