Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Casiano, A/K/A Jose Rivera Jose Casiano, United States of America v. Alfredo Dejesus

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 7, 1997No. 96-1256, 96-1380PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Chief Judge.

In this consolidated action, appellants Jose Casiano and Alfredo DeJesus, each of whom pled guilty to both carjacking and kidnapping, appeal from the application of the twenty-year enhancement mandated by 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) for a second or subsequent conviction for using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. They contend that despite the literal language of the statute, the enhancement is not applicable if the second conviction arises from the same criminal episode and involves the same victim as the first conviction. Casiano appeals Ms…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. United States v. Brian BoothCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Dustin John HiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Wilson, Ralph T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Michael Shane Phipps and Dean Rayburn GilleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Kareem BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API