Wallach v. WILLIAMS
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered.
2Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons advanced by the Appellate Division. (103 N. J. Super. 195 (1968)).
After the original oral argument of the appeal we concluded that the issues involved were sufficiently important to the motoring public and to the oil companies operating in this area to warrant an invitation to a number of such companies to intervene as amid curiae. The companies listed above appeared, filed briefs, furnished specimen copies of various service station leases and dealer contracts as well as photographs of service…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Gittleman v. Central Jersey Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
4Cited by13 opinions
- Bahrle v. Exxon Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Scott v. SalernoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Gittleman v. Central Jersey Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- State v. SidotiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Harmon v. HarmonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.