Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Cinerama, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1961Published

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Motion to vacate a warrant of attachment is granted.

As a condition precedent to the obtention of a warrant the plaintiff was obliged to state facts to show that defendant ‘1 has removed or is about to remove property from the state with *480intent to defraud * * * its creditors, or has assigned, disposed of or secreted, or is about to assign, dispose of or secrete property with the like intent ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 903, subd. 3). [Italics supplied.] Here, according to the affidavit of the plaintiff submitted in support of the warrant, the defendant notified the plaintiff on June 1, 1961 of its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Rourke v. RankinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API